| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NightSnake Moderator


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 61 Karma: 0
Location: United States
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: Two Potential Voters |
|
|
So, let us look at two people:
A) an unemployed, illiterate high-school drop-out who is at the moment drunk and high
B) an honors student who volunteers with a local campaign for mayor and works at CVS, and who doesn't drink or do drugs ever
Which one gets to vote? Person A, yep, because person A has attained the enlightened age of 18 and no one at the polling station notices his drunkenness or highness. Person B is a high-school student, and only 17, so his opinion is worthless. Person A will vote for the person who appears to have the prettiest colored name, who will in turn decide what happens to the tax dollars Person B pays because he works.
This makes sense how exactly? _________________ You just wasted precious seconds reading my signature, you'll never get them back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentkgb Moderator


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 71 Karma: 0
Location: US
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It doesn't make any sense. I got into a debate with someone on one of those mega-huge political forums (and used drunk illiterate high-school drop-outs as an example too), eventually he agreed the voting age should be lowered or else non-voters shouldn't pay taxes, but he actually said that drunk voters were capable voters. _________________ Hey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Activan


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 31 Karma: 0
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are extreme cases, but we need to have some limits in my opinion. A 5-year-old would vote for whoever his parents tell him to, a 10-year-old for whoever his friends are, etc. 18 seems good to me. _________________ Ron Paul 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ulyanov Site Admin


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 171 Karma: 0
Location: NE US
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Matt wrote: | | There are extreme cases, but we need to have some limits in my opinion. A 5-year-old would vote for whoever his parents tell him to, a 10-year-old for whoever his friends are, etc. 18 seems good to me. |
Adults are of course immune to being swayed by such things like that.  _________________ Register!
Contest for week of 5/6/07, win an affiliate spot
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentkgb Moderator


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 71 Karma: 0
Location: US
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some Austrian states let 16-year-olds vote, but American adults are the ones that elected Schwarzenegger. _________________ Hey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matt Activan


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 31 Karma: 0
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentkgb wrote: | | Some Austrian states let 16-year-olds vote, but American adults are the ones that elected Schwarzenegger. |
I'd consider lowering local election ages to 16, no farther. _________________ Ron Paul 2008 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nevitec Newbitik

Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 4 Karma: 0
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like it at 18. Anything like 15 or under seems like a bad idea.
Age 5- Votes whoever his parents tell him to
Age 10- Votes for who his friends are
Age 18- Votes responsibly
Age 169- Votes for whoever will help his retirement benefits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ulyanov Site Admin


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 171 Karma: 0
Location: NE US
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Nevitec wrote: | I like it at 18. Anything like 15 or under seems like a bad idea.
Age 5- Votes whoever his parents tell him to
Age 10- Votes for who his friends are
Age 18- Votes responsibly |
I was OK up until there. There are loads of 18-year-olds who don't vote responsibly. I think the requirements should be replaced with something like high school graduation or whether they pay taxes.
| Nevitec wrote: | | Age 169- Votes for whoever will help his retirement benefits. |
Unfortunately this seems to be true pretty often with the AARP and all. _________________ Register!
Contest for week of 5/6/07, win an affiliate spot
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maximus Vigilus Seriastan


Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 179 Karma: 0
Location: Ancient Rome
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Unfortunately the general consensus among older people is that the younger you are, the less intelligent or relevant your thoughts are to a subject. I personally believe that the voting age should not be changed but rather some sort of testing or evaluation should be done before being able to vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentkgb Moderator


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 71 Karma: 0
Location: US
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maximus Vigilus wrote: | | Unfortunately the general consensus among older people is that the younger you are, the less intelligent or relevant your thoughts are to a subject. I personally believe that the voting age should not be changed but rather some sort of testing or evaluation should be done before being able to vote. |
A voting test would have far too much potential for abuse I think. _________________ Hey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maximus Vigilus Seriastan


Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 179 Karma: 0
Location: Ancient Rome
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentkgb wrote: | | Maximus Vigilus wrote: | | Unfortunately the general consensus among older people is that the younger you are, the less intelligent or relevant your thoughts are to a subject. I personally believe that the voting age should not be changed but rather some sort of testing or evaluation should be done before being able to vote. |
A voting test would have far too much potential for abuse I think. |
In an ideal society without corruption however such a thing would be possible. However I know what you mean, it could be similar to the times of literacy tests during Jim Crow times.
However my point remains clear, some people are far too stupid to be able to vote. _________________ Vah! Denuone Latine loquebar? Mihi ineptum. Interdum modo elabitur |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NightSnake Moderator


Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 61 Karma: 0
Location: United States
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe require something like high school graduation? But then you'd have the hs equivalent of "overnight degrees" for rich kids whose parents don't want them to wait. _________________ You just wasted precious seconds reading my signature, you'll never get them back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maximus Vigilus Seriastan


Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 179 Karma: 0
Location: Ancient Rome
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Maybe require something like high school graduation? |
Then again lots of stupid people get through High School with no problems. I still standby some sort of testing though, with certain requirements to prevent the system from being exploited. _________________ Vah! Denuone Latine loquebar? Mihi ineptum. Interdum modo elabitur |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Houndstooth Seriastan


Joined: 06 May 2007 Posts: 100 Karma: 0
Location: Bobsnox
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anybody who works for CVS should be allowed to vote. CVS is making me good money on the stock market...
<_<
I like 18. Solutions to unqualified voters? I don't have any. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roy's Our Boy Bi-Iridisan

Joined: 07 May 2007 Posts: 69 Karma: 0
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Maximus Vigilus wrote: | | I still standby some sort of testing though, with certain requirements to prevent the system from being exploited. |
I concur. Too many people do not know what is going on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|